ADVERTISEMENT
Without question, President Trump has been opposed by more forces – political and legal – than any president in modern history. Or maybe in our country’s entire history. But because he’s Trump, he never gives up, never stops trying to get what he wants, and that is usually a great thing for our country.
The legal dispute boils down to one question: does the president need congressional authorization to renovate, improve, or expand the White House using privately donated funds? Two Obama-Biden appointed judges on the D.C. Circuit said yes. History, precedent, and basic constitutional logic say otherwise.
The appeals court majority wrote that it was “aware of no instance in American history in which a President unilaterally and using privately collected funds demolished substantial portions of the White House that Congress authorized to be built.” The line is crafted to sound dispositive. It isn’t.
ADVERTISEMENT