ADVERTISEMENT
One of the first hypotheses points to a severe mechanical failure, perhaps aggravated by hostile navigation conditions, a possibility that some experts consider reasonable, although insufficient on its own to explain the speed of the collapse and the magnitude of the disaster
However, there is another much more unsettling theory that is circulating strongly among defense observers and security commentators: the possibility of an external interference, a calculated sabotage, or a hostile action carefully disguised as an accident. That line of suspicion gained even more traction after comments emerged about the presence of vessels identified in the vicinity during the critical stage of the sinking, a detail still not fully confirmed but sufficiently disturbing to raise alarms.

ADVERTISEMENT