ADVERTISEMENT
The legal scholar then broadened his criticism to what he described as a growing movement among some academics and political commentators advocating major constitutional changes.
According to Turley, some advocates of Supreme Court expansion view the judiciary as an obstacle to policy goals they support.
He argued that proposals to increase the number of justices are often tied to efforts to secure favorable rulings on controversial issues.
He pointed to comments from unnamed academics who have argued that certain policy priorities cannot survive judicial review under the current court.
ADVERTISEMENT