ADVERTISEMENT
The Civil Service Reform Act requires judges to pursue their claims through the federal government’s administrative review process rather than in district court, according to U. S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema’s initial dismissal of the case.
The appeals court suggested that Congress might not have intended for federal employees to use the administrative process exclusively if it is no longer independent. The panel directed the district court to gather more information regarding “the continued vitality of the adjudicatory scheme. ” Advertisement After the 4th Circuit declined to pause the decision, Solicitor General D.
John Sauer requested on December 5 that the Supreme Court block it. According to Sauer, “unelected judges do not get to update the intent of unchanged statutes if the court believes recent political events… alter the operation of a statute the way Congress intended.
The justices’ refusal to step in on Friday ended that pause. The judges’ association contended in their opposition to the administration that “the inference that Congress intended to withdraw district-court jurisdiction over federal employment claims may no longer be appropriate” if the administrative review procedure is not separate from the president.
ADVERTISEMENT