ADVERTISEMENT
Meanwhile, Jamie Raskin and other political opponents argue the issue extends far beyond age alone. They cite increasingly inflammatory rhetoric, fantasies about punishing enemies, attacks on public institutions, and statements that appear detached from reality as signs of a deeper danger.
Some critics have even revived discussion of the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which outlines procedures for dealing with a president deemed unable to perform the duties of office. While such conversations remain politically explosive and highly controversial, their very existence reflects how intensely the debate around Trump’s mental fitness has escalated.
ADVERTISEMENT