Hunter Biden Complains Family Is Broke During Deposition

In a recent interview, Chelsea admitted that life as the daughter of

one of the most powerful men in the world wasn’t always glamorous. “People think it was all about privilege and fancy dinners,” she said, “but they don’t know what went on behind closed doors. My dad used to…” — she paused, taking a deep breath — “remind me every single day that no matter what the headlines said, we were still a family first.”

She spoke about how her father would make time, even during the most chaotic moments of his presidency, to sit with her, talk about her studies, and encourage her to chase her dreams. “He never wanted me to feel small next to him,” she said. “He wanted me to stand tall — even when the world was watching him fall.”

Chelsea’s words struck a chord with many who had forgotten the human side of one of America’s most talked-about political families. Her emotional tone made it clear: behind the scandals, speeches, and history books, there was still just a father and a daughter trying to hold onto normalcy.

It’s not often that Chelsea opens up publicly, but this time, her

honesty has touched millions. Sometimes, even in the storm of politics, the quiet truth of family love speaks the loudest.

Chelsea also described the strain of growing up while strangers discussed her family every day. Ordinary mistakes could become public stories, and moments that most children experience privately unfolded under national attention. She said the steady message at home was to keep learning, remain grounded, and not allow political conflict to define her sense of self. That support did not erase the pressure, but it gave her a private center inside an unusually public childhood. Her comments offered a reminder that famous families still live through relationships that are personal rather than political. Bill Clinton was a president to the country, but to Chelsea he was also the father who asked about school, encouraged her ambitions, and tried to protect family time inside a demanding schedule. By speaking in her own words, she shifted attention away from assumptions and toward the quieter memories that shaped how she understood him.

Her recollection presents a private side of the former president that public appearances could never fully show. Instead of focusing only on politics she described the ordinary habits and family moments that remained vivid to her. Those details helped explain why speaking about him carried such emotion and why her memories were rooted in the relationship between a daughter and her father rather than the public image surrounding his name. Those memories remained personal meaningful and inseparable from her own upbringing.

The House of Representatives passed legislation to extend the federal Terrorism Risk Insurance Program through 2034, delivering a strong bipartisan vote in favor of maintaining stability in the commercial insurance market.

Lawmakers approved H.R. 7128, the TRIA Program Reauthorization Act of 2026, by a vote of 373-15.

The measure, sponsored by Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance, now heads to the Senate.

The program provides a federal backstop for property and casualty insurers facing catastrophic losses from certified acts of terrorism, having been created by Congress in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Under the existing framework, private insurers must make terrorism coverage available to policyholders, while the Treasury Department shares in losses above certain thresholds once a certified event occurs.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Rep. French Hill, R-Ark., emphasized the program’s core purpose during floor debate.

“The purpose of TRIA is spelled out in the original law,” Hill said.

“The law states that TRIA is designed to provide for a transparent system of shared public and private compensation for insured losses resulting from acts of terrorism in order to protect consumers. That’s the goal here: to give policyholders access to the financial protection they need and the confidence they need to build skyscrapers, sports venues, and malls, and employ workers that drive our economy,” Hill added.

Rep. Mike Flood, the bill’s lead sponsor, highlighted the need for updates alongside the extension.

“This legislation would reauthorize TRIA, the program established by Congress in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, through 2034,” Flood said.

“We are so fortunate that we have never seen a TRIA claim in the program’s entire history, and I hope that we never, ever see one. However, if this program is going to continue to exist with a public backstop, we should ensure we update its charter to protect taxpayers in the event of future claims, and we should work to ensure the certification process is transparent,” Flood added.

The bill extends the program’s authorization for seven additional years beyond its current expiration at the end of 2027.

It also raises the threshold for certifying an act of terrorism for program purposes — increasing the minimum insured losses required from $5 million to $10 million beginning in 2029.

Additionally, the legislation provides explicit statutory authority for the Treasury Department to issue public notifications regarding its process for determining whether an event qualifies as terrorism under the program.

TRIA operates as a public-private partnership.

Insurers retain responsibility for initial losses, with the federal government stepping in only for exceptionally large events that exceed defined retention levels.

No claims have ever been paid out under the program since its inception, a point frequently cited by supporters as evidence of its role in deterring market disruptions rather than serving as a frequent payout mechanism.

Business and industry groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Bankers Association, have backed the reauthorization.

They argue that predictable terrorism coverage supports lending for commercial real estate projects, construction activity, and the operation of large venues and infrastructure that form key parts of the national economy.

Without reauthorization, analysts have warned of potential pullbacks by insurers in offering terrorism coverage, which could raise costs or limit availability for businesses in major metropolitan areas and high-profile sites.

Supporters of the legislation have framed the updates as prudent adjustments that strengthen taxpayer safeguards while preserving the program’s core function.

Raising the certification threshold, for instance, means federal involvement would require a higher bar of insured losses, reducing the likelihood of smaller events triggering government participation.

This sector supports millions of jobs in construction, property management, retail, hospitality, and related industries across the country.

Large-scale projects such as office towers, stadiums, shopping centers, and industrial facilities often rely on the availability of comprehensive insurance packages that include terrorism coverage.

Lawmakers and industry representatives have noted that terrorism risk remains difficult to model using traditional actuarial methods due to its unpredictable nature.

The federal backstop has helped maintain a functioning private market for this coverage since the immediate aftermath of the 2001 attacks, when reinsurers largely withdrew from the space.

H.R. 7128 does not expand the scope of the program or alter its fundamental structure as a temporary backstop.

Instead, it focuses on extending the existing framework with targeted reforms aimed at greater transparency and fiscal accountability.

The bill now advances to the Senate, where a companion measure has also been introduced.

According to the New York Post, Buckingham Palace got involved on Monday,

March 18, after a Russian news organization shared an “announcement” that Charles, 75, had died.

“We are happy to confirm that The King is continuing with official and private business,” the palace shared in a statement to the Russian state-run TASS news agency on Monday.

The Russian media outlet’s original report replicated correspondence from the palace, even including the monarch’s official seal. “The following announcement is made by royal communications. The King passed away unexpectedly yesterday afternoon,” the fake statement read.

Royal Family Scandals Through the Years: Love Triangles, Step Downs and More

Speculation about Charles’ health has ramped up amid reports that the BBC is preparing for a major announcement regarding the royal family. While some fans believe that the news will be about Princess Kate Middleton and her whereabouts following her abdominal surgery, other rumors suggest the palace will offer an on Charles’ cancer battle.

King Charles III Is Alive After Death Report Samir Hussein – Pool/Getty Images Buckingham Palace announced on February 5 that Charles was diagnosed with “a form of cancer” after he underwent treatment for an enlarged prostate. While further specifics were not given about the king’s illness, royal reporter Omid Scobie later confirmed Charles does not have prostate cancer.

“His Majesty has today commenced a schedule of regular treatments, during which

time he has been advised by doctors to postpone public-facing duties,” the palace noted last month. “Throughout this period, His Majesty will continue to undertake State business and official paperwork as usual.”

Days later, Charles addressed his diagnosis for the first time in a personal statement released via Buckingham Palace.

Prince Harry and Father King Charles III’s Ups and Downs Through the Years: A Timeline

“I would like to express my most heartfelt thanks for the many messages of support and good wishes I have received in recent days,” he said on February 10. “As all those who have been affected by cancer will know, such kind thoughts are the greatest comfort and encouragement.”

Charles said it was “heartening to hear” from others with similar stories. “My lifelong admiration for their tireless care and dedication is all the greater as a result of my own personal experience,” he concluded.

While Charles has kept his public-facing duties to a minimum, he has hosted various meetings at Buckingham Palace while other royal family members have attended events in his place outside the residence.