ADVERTISEMENT

Buckingham Palace confirms the rumor, Camilla Parker Bowles is b…

ADVERTISEMENT

Accountability and Broader Efforts

House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), an original cosponsor, emphasized the need for accountability as large sums flow to state and local governments. “Every dollar must be safeguarded against waste, fraud, and abuse,” he stated. The legislation builds on oversight investigations that have highlighted vulnerabilities in federal programs. It forms part of a broader package of 11 Oversight Committee bills addressing issues ranging from student aid fraud to improper payments across agencies.

Democrats largely opposed the measure, with nearly all voting against it and only a small number crossing party lines. The bill now advances to the Senate. Supporters frame the effort as consistent with broader initiatives to improve government efficiency, including the White House Task Force to Eliminate Fraud and the Department of Government Efficiency. The legislation aims to shift from reactive recovery to proactive prevention, directing limited resources toward eligible recipients while reducing losses to fraudsters and ineligible claimants.


Another day, another federal court stuffed with activist judges who believe their rulings should be based on hurting President Donald Trump.

On Monday, a federal appeals court ruled 2-1 that portions of the Trump administration’s policy of not admitting trans people into military service were unlawful.

Oh, and contained “animus” or something.

The court has ruled that the policy is unconstitutional and further stated that it “appears to be driven by the bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group.” It also states that the policy advanced by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is “arbitrary and based on animus.”

“The record shows that the purpose of the Hegseth Policy is to target applicants and servicemembers who express what the Administration believes is a ‘false gender identity,’ and the Policy goes far beyond disqualifying persons currently or recently suffering from gender dysphoria,” the decision says.

“Some of those disqualifications are completely unexplained and have no reasonable justification.”

Hows this for justification. The military has been working endlessly for years to stamp out sexual harrassment and assault. Now some bozo judges with TDS want to allowed gender confused people into the military?

ADVERTISEMENT

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT