ADVERTISEMENT
Breaking News: Emergency Response Underway in New York City Involving Prominent Public Figure
The emergency dispute arrived at the Court just as the discounted-rate requirements were scheduled to take effect and as campaigns began committing substantial sums to television and radio advertising.
Republican committees warned that broadcasters had already begun withdrawing favorable rates following the lower court decision, increasing the cost of reaching voters before Election Day.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only justice to publicly dissent from the Court’s unsigned decision.
The dispute concerns the Federal Communications Commission’s “lowest unit charge” rules, which require broadcasters to give legally qualified candidates favorable advertising rates during specified periods before elections.
Four Democratic congressional candidates challenged that policy before the FCC and later asked the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to invalidate it while their administrative challenge remained pending.
Republican committees then turned to the Supreme Court, arguing that losing the discounts so close to the midterms would force them to spend significantly more money for advertising they had already planned around the lower rates.
ADVERTISEMENT