ADVERTISEMENT

A Hacker Stole 633,000 Arizona Voter Files in 2020, Confessed to the FBI — and Biden Refused to Prosecute Him

ADVERTISEMENT

No charges. No accountability. No public disclosure. Nothing. The FBI closed its case, wrote a letter documenting what had happened, and the cover-up of non-secure elections continued uninterrupted while Democrat Katie Hobbs — then Arizona Secretary of State, now governor — told voters the state had conducted “easily the smoothest and most secure election in recent history.”

Chris Krebs, then director of CISA, told the entire country that 2020 was the most secure election in American history. He knew about this breach. He said nothing except to call President Trump a liar.

Jeff Clark’s question cuts to the heart of what nobody in Arizona’s legal establishment wants to answer: “Was the hacker told he was golden and could skate? Is that why he maintained he acted alone? That tends to happen when a target knows they’re not going to be prosecuted.”

Four prosecutors. Four declinations. A hacker who confessed. Evidence that was then deliberately destroyed. And a Republican-controlled county Board of Supervisors that went before Congress and called their election “the most secure, verified election in our history.”

Democrats will reach for their standard defense: voter registration data is different from vote-counting systems, and auditable paper ballots would catch any attempt to alter actual vote totals. That distinction is legitimate as far as it goes. It does not explain why a hacker who stole 633,000 voter files and confessed to a federal crime faced zero legal consequence from any of four separate prosecutorial offices.

It does not explain why the public was never told. It does not explain the destroyed evidence, the non-prosecution, or the continued assurances of maximum security from officials who were sitting on this case.

ADVERTISEMENT

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT