ADVERTISEMENT
No charges. No accountability. No public disclosure. Nothing. The FBI closed its case, wrote a letter documenting what had happened, and the cover-up of non-secure elections continued uninterrupted while Democrat Katie Hobbs — then Arizona Secretary of State, now governor — told voters the state had conducted “easily the smoothest and most secure election in recent history.”
Jeff Clark’s question cuts to the heart of what nobody in Arizona’s legal establishment wants to answer: “Was the hacker told he was golden and could skate? Is that why he maintained he acted alone? That tends to happen when a target knows they’re not going to be prosecuted.”
Four prosecutors. Four declinations. A hacker who confessed. Evidence that was then deliberately destroyed. And a Republican-controlled county Board of Supervisors that went before Congress and called their election “the most secure, verified election in our history.”
It does not explain why the public was never told. It does not explain the destroyed evidence, the non-prosecution, or the continued assurances of maximum security from officials who were sitting on this case.
ADVERTISEMENT