ADVERTISEMENT
I initially gave the Democrats some benefit of the doubt regarding the Tennessee redistricting conflict, which escalated into chaos at the state capitol when a new map was implemented following the Louisiana v. Callais decision.
Naturally, the theatrics reminiscent of Jim Crow spilled over in many ways. Now we have Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) sounding off, claiming that the new electoral map will eliminate all black representation in Congress.
“States like Tennessee want to wipe out every black representative,” she claimed during an event with the University of Chicago Institute of Politics.
For the record, there are no Republican House members from New England, and there are tens of millions of Republican voters spread across those states.
And okay, there probably won’t be as many Democrats throughout the South once all the previously race-gerrymandered districts are gone. But there are likely to be more black Republicans.
Enjoying our conservative news and commentary? Make sure you share and tell your friends about us!
We don’t call Democrats the Domestic Terrorist Party for laughs or clicks. We call ’em that because we genuinely believe that’s who and what they are.
She literally stumped for Cuba last week and claimed she was working against President Trump’s policies and our own country to help that commie regime obtain oil because ‘muh human rights’ or something:
“The Democrats continue to show Americans who they really are – the America Last party who sip margaritas with terrorists, advocate for illegal alien criminals, and undermine the United States to aid a failed, communist regime,” White House spokesperson Olivia Wales told Fox News Digital.
“Pramila Jayapal’s actions are shameful from a sitting Congresswoman clearly suffering from [Trump Derangement Syndrome],” Wales added.
“I was in conversations with the ambassadors from Mexico and some other places … trying to figure out how to get oil there,” Jayapal said during the briefing, calling the situation on the island “a crisis beyond imagination.”
“As many of you know, I traveled to Cuba as part of a congressional delegation last month,” she said. “It is part of my role to see how U.S. foreign policy is actually affecting the people in the countries where that policy is being implemented.”
She said she met with Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel, senior government officials, political dissidents, civil society groups and foreign diplomats during the trip.
Video of the remarks circulated widely on X, where users criticized the progressive lawmaker’s comments and raised legal concerns.
Conservative accounts amplified the clip, including End Wokeness, which claimed she was “conspiring against the U.S.” and suggested her actions could constitute a federal felony. Libs of TikTok wrote that her actions “seems a little like treason to me.”
Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) went further.
“Who do we represent?! Do we represent the interests of the American people, or do we represent the interests of hostile foreign regimes like Cuba?”
“And she seems to believe the latter.”
“I mean, the reality is that this is an evil communist regime that tortures its own people, that operates as a hub for some of our biggest geopolitical adversaries, including Russia, whom she also believes that she ought to be helping aid the importation of oil into Cuba for.”
“So this is astounding on so many levels, but I think that it’s something that the American people recognize, is that we’ve got a Democrat party who is operating in the interests of our geopolitical foes, and that’s a big problem.”
A ‘little’ like treason? How about a lot like treason, giving “aid and comfort” to an enemy nation. Then there’s the alleged felony associated with it. Let’s hope the Justice Department gets involved here because until something happens to them legally, these Democrat commies won’t stop undermining our country.
Enjoying our conservative news and commentary? Make sure you share and tell your friends about us!
Democrats are facing political headwinds the party hasn’t faced in 100 years. Between GOP states redistricting out Democrat seats, the Supreme Court’s ruling that using race to draw districts under the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional, and the upcoming 2030 Census that will lead to blue states losing congressional seats due to loss of residents, the party is facing decades of insignificance.
Or at least, I hope so. The Supreme Court gave us another victory on Monday that will help solidify GOP majorities in Congress for the foreseeable future by ruling that Alabama can redistrict two of its race-based current districts ahead of the midterms, thanks to the Voting Rights ruling:
Alabama can now move forward to eliminate at least one of those race-based districts.
Republicans have managed to surge ahead on the issue, most notably in Texas and in Florida. Prediction markets have begun to reflect the turning tides, as Democrats look far less likely to gain control of the House after the midterms.
But nothing in politics is a gimme; Republicans – and let’s be honest, President Trump, too – have a lot of ground to make up. This Iran war, necessary as it sounds like it was, has thrown a wrench in the GOP timeline to get prices down and make life more affordable for all Americans.
Inflation is back up; gas prices are way too high; and food and housing are still inflated.
We all know Democrats will run on that this fall; we also know they are lying their rear ends off because nothing in our country will improve under the Domestic Terrorist Party. Literally nothing.
Trump and Republicans still have time to turn things around. The redistricting will help.
Enjoying our conservative news and commentary? Make sure you share and tell your friends about us!
The Domestic Terrorist Party keeps getting bad news regarding its effort to retake at least the House of Representatives this fall during the midterms. CNN, surprisingly, delivered the latest dose of news Hakeem Jeffries didn’t want to hear.
Seems like the party that is polling lower than whale dung at the bottom of the sea isn’t such a shoo-in to recapture the House, as noted by the network’s data analyst Harry Enten.
Just a month ago, he says there was an 86 percent chance the Dems would regain the House. But despite higher gas prices and angst over the war with Iran, Democrat chances actually fell this month by 10 points:
Here’s more:
Two court rulings in the past two weeks have hit the chances that Democrats flip control of the House in November, according to traders on prediction markets platform Kalshi.
Odds that the party wins control of the lower chamber have fallen to 75% from 85.3% on April 28.
On April 29, the Supreme Court ruled in Louisiana v. Callais that a majority-Black congressional district in Louisiana was invalid, limiting how much race can be considered when drawing congressional maps and weakening part of the Voting Rights Act.
That district, like many of the other majority-black congressional districts across the South, is represented by a Democrat. Louisiana is moving to redraw its maps in a move that will likely see one less Democratic member of Congress sent from the state.
Republicans have a lot of ground to make up, it’s true. But here’s the thing: President Trump’s action against Iran will wrap up soon after total victory, and he’ll begin refocusing on one of his signature campaign pledges: Getting the economy rolling again.
That’ll mean lower gas prices, which will then lead to lower prices overall for goods. Also, congressional Republicans could help their cause by passing more of their agenda. Seems like a win-win, given that regardless of what the party of Destruction campaigns on, nothing they will do for our country will be good.
Enjoying our conservative news and commentary? Make sure you share and tell your friends about us!
The Domestic Terrorist Party is big mad they lost their attempt to radically gerrymander Virginia’s congressional map. They know they needed those four additional seats to improve their chances of taking back the House in November.
But there is a much broader reason why they are big mad, and it was summarized well in a couple of tweets on X this week, which I’ll post below.
In short, Democrats are facing an electoral wipeout thanks to a confluence of factors, and that’s why the party’s members and leaders are so desperate and panicky.
Here’s the first tweet:
Begun, the Redistricting War has.
Between now and 2028, Democrats are going to try to target a host of additional states, including ones they’ve already worked to gerrymander, both successfully (California) and unsuccessfully (Virginia).
Not all of these efforts will succeed (for example, Colorado will be difficult to abolish the commission due to the 55% constitutional amendment threshold and Illinois/California Dems may have to leave at least one GOP vote sink each) but Republicans must be prepared to double down and do the necessary work to preempt the Dems because it is essentially inevitable that they WILL redraw more maps somewhere.
That means flipping back the Utah seat, redrawing Nebraska, flipping the governorship and the courts in Kansas and Kentucky, redrawing Indiana, finishing the job in the South, eliminating the two swing districts in Iowa, redrawing Texas again, and most importantly BLOCKING anticipated Dem efforts in states like Pennsylvania, Virginia, Minnesota, and Maine.
Dems have more theoretical targets (however difficult they may be) than we do between now and 2030 because they’ve accomplished so little and we’ve accomplished so much. We are now ahead. We need to maintain that lead and run the clock out on them before the 2030 census crushes them.
And here’s the second:
I don’t think people understand just how much of an existential crisis Democrats are in. If they don’t gain control of the House, Senate, Presidency, pack the Supreme Court, re-mandate racial gerrymandering, and give illegals mass amnesty by 2032, they will all but die as a nationally competitive political party.
With the VRA being overturned we will net at least 15 seats and the census will give us like a dozen more, as well as forcing democrats to redraw their seats being bolstered by illegals, making them more republican. This will make the house all but impossible to win for Dems.
Then the senate will become increasingly hard for them to win as states like Nevada keep shifting red and republicans slowly keep picking better candidates.
And the nail in the coffin? The census will make it all but impossible for dems to win the presidency unless they win the popular vote by at least 6 points.
We’re witnessing the last gasps of the satanic ideology known as leftism. We will win.
It’s important to note that Democrats won’t go willingly into the night. They will fight their death tooth and nail. They’ll cheat (even more). They’ll call for violence. They will become violent. They will pull every lever, use every tool, to claw back even a modicum of power and relevance.
And as always, they will have plenty of help from the ‘mainstream media.’ The good news there, however, is that fewer and fewer Americans are watching those lunatics. Nevertheless, it’s time to brace yourself and buckle up for what’s coming.
Enjoying our conservative news and commentary? Make sure you share and tell your friends about us!
President Trump dropped an Iran war bombshell at the White House on Monday that helps explain why the Iranian people never rose up against the Islamonazi leaders who were murdering them by the tens of thousands just a few short months ago.
Fair warning: This will seriously tick you off.
According to the president, the situation was not solely due to public demoralization following the regime’s murderous crackdown on protests in late 2025 and early 2026. He said that a larger U.S. strategy to arm anti-regime forces inside Iran was ultimately hindered by a third party: the Iraqi Kurds, whom the United States had intended to utilize as ground forces in southern Iran:
“The Kurds disappointed us. The Kurds TAKE, TAKE, TAKE.”
“We sent some guns with ammunition. They were supposed to be delivered, but they KEPT IT. I said they’re gonna keep it. What do I know?!”
“And I said it wasn’t gonna work.”
“I disagreed with what they did. I said — they wouldn’t get there. I was right.”
“No weapons, they have no guns. We thought the Kurds were gonna give us weapons, but the Kurds disappointed us,” President Trump revealed in the Oval Office. “The Kurds take, take, take. They have a great reputation in Congress. Congress says, oh, they fight so hard. No, they fight hard when they get paid.”
“So I’m very disappointed in the Kurds, but they were given, I said it wasn’t gonna work, by the way,” he added. “I just have to say it. I disagreed with what they did, they gave it. I said, they’ll never get there. And I was right, I like to be right. In this case, too bad, but we sent some guns with ammunition and they were supposed to be delivered, but they kept it. I said, they’re gonna keep it, but what do I know? I’ve only been doing this a short period of time.”‘
All of this comes as a peace deal and permanent cease-fire in the war are on life support. Trump has said that the Iranian leaders, whoever they are, will make promises, walk them back, then counter with unserious proposals.
New reports indicated that Israeli and U.S. forces are back on high alert for potential new strikes against Iran. Stay tuned.
Enjoying our conservative news and commentary? Make sure you share and tell your friends about us!
It’s a mystery to many Americans as to why “The View,” with its unhinged ranty hosts, has managed to remain on the air for more than 25 years. But when you think about it and consider that there are so many lefty Americans with mental health issues in the country, it begins to make more sense.
That said, the rhetoric on the current iteration of The View has always been inflammatory, but what these lunatics said this week about the 4-3 ruling by the Supreme Court of Virginia striking down the illegal Democrat gerrymandered congressional map is beyond the pale.
Some of the ‘ladies’ should be losing their jobs, starting with chief ignoramus Whoopi Goldberg.
Her fact-free rants are legendary, but this time they’re dangerous: She openly made false claims about why the court ruled the way it did:
The View falsely claims Virginia Supreme Court told voters this about redistricting: “They came and said, no, that’s not what you want, we changing it.” In reality, Democrats violated the state’s Constitution.
Absolutely right. This ruling had zero to do with ‘destroying democracy’ and everything to do with ensuring Virginia statutes and the state constitution were upheld, period.
Then Whoopi said this:
I mean, it’s kind of crazy when the party says, ‘you know, we care about voters’ rights and people are cheating and we are in there, we’re going to make sure they don’t,’ and then they kind of cheat. This feels like a cheat.
It’s not a “cheat.” If anything, she should be blaming Virginia Democrats for putting the gerrymandered map to a vote the way they did; it was unconstitutional.
Up next is former Trump 1.0 official and fake conservative Alyssa Farah Griffin, who called the state high court’s invoking the state constitution a “technicality” (fun fact: She’s not a lawyer):
The Virginia Constitution was not just a minor detail in this case; the decision depended on the specific wording of the Constitution regarding the issue at hand. Additionally, the justices were not simply obeying Trump’s orders or anyone else’s. In Virginia, justices of the state Supreme Court are appointed by the General Assembly.
But claiming that Trump is to blame for all of this, which is the default position for members of the Domestic Terrorist Party, nevertheless happened, because ‘muh Texas redistricting’ or something, compliments of Ana Navarro, who used typical incendiary language to make her false charge:
To correct the lie, no, it was Democrats in New York who started the redistricting wars, as House Speaker Mike Johnson pointed out on X: “House Democrats started the current mid-decade redistricting battle in NY before the 2024 election. Now that it’s backfired on them, they are pushing a stunning next step: nuke the judicial branch of government and pack the court!”
The segment ended with all Viewsters agreeing that more blue states should redistrict. But here’s another fun fact: Most of them gerrymandered Republican representation out of their states decades ago.
Bottom line is this: The inflammatory rhetoric coming from these terrorists is fueling attacks on Trump supporters and the rule of law. They have to pay at least an economic price for this, and ABC would be 100 percent right to impose one by canceling this abomination of a show.
Enjoying our conservative news and commentary? Make sure you share and tell your friends about us!
Sarah Fitzpatrick has aggressively criticized FBI Director Kash Patel, accusing him of being negligent and an alcoholic while serving as the head of the nation’s leading law enforcement and domestic intelligence agency. In response, Patel’s lawyers have filed a lawsuit against her.
The article in question relies heavily on anonymous sources, which comes as no surprise, given that this same reporter previously promoted the false claims made by Julie Swetnick, who attempted to derail Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination.
Nevertheless, the FBI has a responsibility to fulfill. When Ms. Fitzpatrick requested their assistance regarding threats she was receiving related to her article published in The Atlantic, it led to an unexpected twist. The publication reached out to law enforcement, which subsequently referred Ms. Fitzpatrick to the FBI.
While Fitzpatrick has continued her work, there has been considerable discussion within Washington, D.C., about her situation, especially after MS Now claimed that the FBI was investigating her in relation to the article. This claim has been denied.
However, it appears there is a threat assessment probe involving her, although it pertains to a different matter. The threats against her surfaced just three days after the critical article about Kash Patel was published in April.
Rachel Bade has more:
The FBI has opened a “threat assessment” case into menacing messages sent to Fitzpatrick — called a “guardian intake” in FBI speak, I’m told by an FBI official who requested anonymity to share details. It did so because the reporter herself contacted the bureau twice.
THE DETAILS — On April 20, Fitzpatrick described the horrifying messages in a call to the FBI. “Your days are numbered,” one read. Another said, “It’ll be your obituary,” according to this FBI official. Fitzpatrick first went to the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, which referred her to the FBI, according to a statement The Atlantic gave me tonight.
A few hours before her outreach to the FBI, Patel’s lawyers had filed a lawsuit against The Atlantic over Fitzpatrick’s piece. The filing temporarily included Fitzpatrick’s home address, which alarmed the reporter, she would later tell agency officials.
In addition to speaking with her, the FBI was also in communication with MPD to make sure her house didn’t get swatted, I’m told.
On May 5, Fitzpatrick and Atlantic attorney DAVID BAUMGARTEN attended a Zoom meeting with FBI officers, where they shared additional threatening messages she’d received. I’m told Fitzpatrick relayed to the officers that she received calls during the night and had concerns about her family’s safety.
PLOT THICKENS — The irony of the entire situation won’t be lost on those who’ve read Fitzpatrick’s work: A reporter whose coverage the FBI director sued over, now consulting with the FBI about her safety. And an agency making moves to protect a journalist who’s been the bane of its director’s existence.
But that’s the job of the FBI, isn’t it? That said, D.C. is rife with these kinds of strange bedfellows.
As far as the death threats go, obviously, those are never, ever okay, despite Fitzpatrick’s outrageous claims in her article.
Enjoying our conservative news and commentary? Make sure you share and tell your friends about us!
Like many of you, I was quite disappointed when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against President Trump’s Executive Branch authority to impose wide-ranging tariffs as part of his foreign policy tool chest. But they did, and that is that.
However, the president on Tuesday did get some good news regarding his second round of tariffs from a U.S. appeals court, which paused a ruling from the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) that had struck them down.
The new set of tariffs was enacted immediately after the Supreme Court’s decision, which invalidated the original Liberation Day tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). This measure established a baseline tariff of 10 percent on all U.S. trading partners.
The new tariffs were initially blocked last Friday. They were implemented under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which permits temporary import surcharges without Congressional approval for a period of 150 days.
The tariffs are expected to expire by the end of July unless Congress decides to extend them.
Now, there is an argument to be made, and some on our side have made it, that tariffs serve as a tax on imported goods and that companies importing those tariffed goods are raising prices to cover the tariffs, which is adding to inflation.
While the argument is sound, I’m not an economist and therefore can’t really intelligently say one way or another if Trump’s tariffs are actually causing prices to rise (I more so think most of it is due to rising gas prices, which will fall when the Iran war is over and the Strait of Hormuz is reopened shortly).
That said, Trump’s using the tariffs to level the playing field with countries that have long imposed similar tariffs on all U.S. imports, putting American companies at a disadvantage. This is part of his ‘America First’ agenda and a majority of voters supported it.
Trump’s team continues to negotiate trade deals with countries, thereby negating the need for tariffs or, in some cases, making them reciprocal. We’ll see how this latest tariff appeals court ruling plays out.
Enjoying our conservative news and commentary? Make sure you share and tell your friends about us!
Some day, Democrats will learn that minimum wage laws do not help workers. The fact is, they only make things more expensive while leading to reduced hours, fewer jobs, and shuttered businesses.
California enacted a $20/hour minimum wage law, and Los Angeles is pushing a $30/hour minimum wage for hospitality workers in the run-up to the 2028 Olympic Games. Both have already had disastrous economic effects, and Los Angeles is advocating for a $ 30-per-hour minimum wage for hospitality workers in anticipation of the 2028 Olympic Games. Both of these measures have already had disastrous economic effects.
In the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, the $ 15-an-hour minimum wage is having exactly the same effect. I added some emphasis:
When the Minneapolis City Council approved a controversial $15 minimum wage in 2017, no one knew what would happen next.
Workers and business owners made dueling predictions of boom or bust that would result from the citywide wage hike. Cities with similar policies were still phasing in the $15 minimum, so it was impossible to say who was right.
Nearly a decade later, businesses in Minneapolis and St. Paul — which passed its own similar law in 2018 — say they’re stretched thinner than ever, and both cities have lost thousands of jobs.
Pressure on the hospitality industry is particularly acute. Restaurants and other leisure-related businesses say shrinking margins have left them less able to weather economic shocks, such as the federal immigration crackdown that forced many to temporarily close this winter.
The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which has studied the effects of the $15 minimum wage in Minneapolis since 2018, recently reported minimum wage policies have resulted in higher hourly pay but fewer available hours and positions. That has meant lower earnings: Between 2017 and 2021, the average decline in wage earnings across all industries was 1% in Minneapolis and about 2% in St. Paul. The research controlled for the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and unrest after George Floyd’s murder in 2020.
This is a bald-faced lie. There is literally decades’ worth of research showing time and time again that forced minimum wage hikes lead to fewer jobs. And why? Because government forcing business owners to pay wages they can’t afford lead to lay-offs and eliminated positions.
Just because “voters demand” more money from a business doesn’t mean that money for higher wages magically shows up when the ballot issue passes.
In fact, it’s communist for the government to tell a business what they must pay workers. Business owners take all the risks of starting a business and trying to build it into a success while navigating a labyrinth of risks and regulations. Business owners know what they can and can’t afford to pay workers, and that’s no one else’s business to decide.
Then again, the Domestic Terrorism Party wants everyone to be poor, so the loss of jobs is actually a feature of mandatory minimum wages.
Enjoying our conservative news and commentary? Make sure you share and tell your friends about us!
ADVERTISEMENT
